Saturday, 25 August 2012

Apple - Samsung Verdict - Live from TheVerge.com


LIVE FEED AS it Happened - From TheVerge.com













1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars
Damages.
STA: No for unregisted iphone trade dress and iPad Trade dress
SEA: No for iPad Trade Dress.
Question 19
No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.
For STA: Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.
No for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, S2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.
For SEC: Yes to Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant.
If you found the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC) and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress?
Question 16.
STA: Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant. No for Captivate, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.4:00:06 PM PDT

No for Captive, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, S2, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Infuse 4G

Yes on Fascinate, i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant.
SEC

15

Dilution? Apple provide Registered iPhone and unreigsted iphone 3G diluted, no others.
Apple has proven only the iPhone 3G trade dress protectable.
On to trade dress. Samsung has NOT proven that'893 trade dress is not protectable.
No across the board. Not a single one proven invalid by Samsung.
381 Not proven invalid.
Invalidity. Another biggie.
STA: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889
SEA: Yes for 381, 915, 163
SEC: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889
Sorry, last question was whether Samsung should have known. This next one is willfulness.
'889 No for both Galaxy Tab models.
D'305: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Showcase, Gem, Indugle, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Vibrant.
D'087: Yes for S 4G, Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 Epic 4G Touch, S2 Skyrocket, Infuse 4G.
D'677: Yes for Fascinate, S 4G, S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant
Question 9 — was Samsung willful in its infringement? Big one here for damages.
No across the board
D'889 Patent.
For STA: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Chrarge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize and Vibrant.
Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.
Again, SEC up first.
The D'305 patent.
Question 7.
For STA: yes on S 4G and Vibrant only.
Yes for S i9000, S 4G, and Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 i9100, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.
D'087 Patent. SEC up first.
for STA, Yes for Galaxy S 4G, S2 Tmobile, S2 Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant
that was for SEC
No for Ace.
Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 Tmobile, S 2 Epic 4G touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.
Infringement of D'677 patent.
No for Captiavet, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant
'163: Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, xhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish.
No for Replenish
'915: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Droid harge, Epic 4G, Exhibit, Fascinate, Prevaila, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intecept, Mesmerize, Nexus, Transform, and Vibrant
'381: Yes for all devices.
Inducement for '381 '915 '163
Question 4
No for Captivate, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform and Vibrant
for STA: Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Prevail, S 4G, SII ATT, S 2 TMobile, Galaxy Tab, Mesmerize and Replanish
For SEA: Galaxy Tab 10.1 Yes.
No for Captivate, COntinuum, Gem, Indulge, INtercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant. Yes for Fascinate.
Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Ace, Prevail, Galaxy X, Galaxy S 4g, S II AT&T, i9100, S II Tmobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish
SEC up first
Claim 50 of '163 patent
Question 3
No on intercept and Replenish
for STA: Yes for Captiavte, Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit, Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, S II AT&T, SII T Mobile, Galaxy Tab, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Nexus S 4G, Tranform and Vibrant
For SEA: Yes on Galaxy Tab 10.1
No on Ace Intercept and Replenish
For SEC Captivate, continuum, droid charge, fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II, i9100, Galaxy s 2 Tmobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse, Nexus S 4G, all yes
Question Two. Claim 8 of 915 patent
Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Galasy Ace, Prevail, S 4G, S II, Galaxy Tab, The Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerie, Nexus S 4G, Replenish and Vibrant
STA yes for Captivate
for SEA, Galaxy Tab Wifi
Answer for all devices is YES
For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent
Apple's claims
This is it. This is history. The verdict from the Jury 

Sponsor