Saturday, 25 August 2012

Samsung Claim against Apple - Live Theverge.com


Suffice to say, Samsung's legal team cannot be happy right now.
Both decisions for Apple.
'516: yes. '941: yes.
Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung is barred by patent exhaustion from enforcing the following Samsung patents against Apple?
Patent exhaustion. The Intel question.
No.
Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing one or more technology markets related to the UMTS standard?
Question 31.
No.
Did Apple prove that Samsung breached it's obligations when developing the UTMS standard?
Antitrust.
Damages from Samsung to Apple: zero.
DId Apple prove they were invalid? No across the board
No across the board. Wow. Nothing on Samsung's utility patents.
No on all but the iPod touch. It's up next...
'460 no across the board
'516 No
'460: literally infirngement for 3GS: no
'893 iPhone 3GS No
'711 iPhone 3GS: No
'711 Patent on iPhone 3G No. '460 on iPhone 3G: no.
Samsung's claims against Apple up next